January 30th, 2009 — 10:25am
Every single person who visits our offices always comments on the size of our lift. When we were moving in it was a pain. Almost every piece of furniture had to be carried up five flights of stairs because the lift is so small. Chalky swapped his commuting bike for a folding Brompton because he got fed up of lugging it five floors.
In case you think we’re exaggerating, its dimensions are approximately 38 inches wide by 21 inches deep. (That’s 97cms x 54cms in new money.)

Actual size

It’s supposed to hold 4 people. But they’d have to be very thin people, not because of the weight limit (although Chalky is 100kg on his own), but just to fit into the thing. It would work out as just less than 200 square inches of floor space each ( approximately 14 inches by 14 inches for the less mathematically adept among you – just less than 36cms x 36cms in new money). Even two people have to synchronise their breathing. Perhaps we should market it as therapy for claustrophobics, or a leisure destination for agrophobics.
2 comments » | Makes you think
January 29th, 2009 — 12:52pm
You may have seen that there may not be enough money to have a GB Water Polo team at the Olympics in 2012, which I think is disgusting – and Seb Coe should hang his head in shame.
Firstly, I’ll declare my interest: I used to play water polo. It was a long time ago – my days of tight rubber trunks and gumshields are way behind me now. It’s a great game (to play, if not to watch) and to take part at the highest level you have to be a hell of an athlete. Not to mention tough – although it’s technically a non-contact sport, it’s one of the most brutal and demanding games you can play.
But my dismay at the situation is not because I feel a special affinity for water polo. I think it’s just as wrong if handball or volleyball or any of the other sports under threat aren’t funded to compete. The same applies to the paralympic sports under threat.
Quite how we can spend billions upon billions on hosting the Olympics and not have enough money to field a team in every event (as other host nations do) is beyond me. And how cycling (which I am a fan of) can get millions and millions of funding, on the basis that they are really successful – while others struggle to compete – can make any sense is also beyond me. How do other sports improve if we only fund the ones that are successful? It’s like only allocating teachers to the brightest kids. And wasn’t the point of the Olympics that it would raise participation in sport and make us a healthier nation? What kind of message does not competing in events where we may not win send to the obese youth of the country? They’ll just carry on eating fast food in front of the telly – after all they’re not going to win anything either – unless pie-eating becomes an olympic sport.
Call me old fashioned, but isn’t the spirit of the Olympics best summed up by “It’s not the winning, it’s the taking part that matters”?
Chalky
Comment » | Makes you think, Serious stuff
January 28th, 2009 — 9:43am
This made me laugh when I saw it in Private Eye. I guess if you substitute “Britain”, “future”, and “bicycle” for “America”, “Michelle” and “Puppy”, then it would work for David Cameron.

I suppose it was inevitable that after Blair got in by copying Clinton’s campaign, that the conservatives’ strategy would be to do whatever Obama had done. Hence the shoe-horning in of the ridiculous line “Now for change” onto a perfectly good (in political advertising if not factual terms) poster – “Dad’s nose. Mum’s eyes. Gordon Brown’s Debt.”
“Now for change” does that mean they are cheaper now, or does it mean that they’ll be standing for something else as soon as the results of the next focus groups are in? It’s not even english. You can just imagine the meeting can’t you – “we love the poster, but can it say change?” and a room full of chinless types all nodding vigorously and repeating the word “change” over and over. And there was probably a suggestion to have “Yes we can” in there too. Although I suppose they’d have preferred it say “Yes one can”
Comment » | Made us smile, Makes you think
January 23rd, 2009 — 3:03pm
This poster made us laugh out loud, stop and take a picture. So we doff our Zeus caps to whoever did it. Nice one.

Comment » | Made us smile
January 21st, 2009 — 4:33pm
Seems as though the whole world is trying to get on Barak Obama’s bandwagon, so can Zeus join in? Yes we can.

This picture, taken back in November, waaay before people were designing Run DC T-shirts, shows one of our point of sale posters in a local newsagents. I reckon Barry (he’ll be more popular in the UK as Barry than Barak) will need to read the Wall Street Journal Europe if he’s going to sort out the global financial crisis.
Comment » | News, Serious stuff
January 20th, 2009 — 1:42pm
Think of a name for the dog in the picture and the winner gets a bag of chocolate buttons! All entries by 31st Jan. GOOD LUCK!

7 comments » | Made us smile, competition
January 17th, 2009 — 11:34am
On a similar subject, whenever there’s a chatshow on, my wife and I play a game to try and be the quickest to guess why the guest is there. As soon as the guest comes on, you have to say TV series, or film, or book, or DVD, good cause or exercise video etc etc. It makes dull chatshows much more bearable
Chalky
Comment » | Made us smile
January 17th, 2009 — 9:16am

Is it just me or does everybody think about advertising when they see the news? Watching the BBC news report last night about the plane that ditched in the river in New York, apart from the expected “wow” thought, I found myself thinking “that’s great advertising for Twitter” even though I don’t even properly understand (or even like the idea of) twitter. (The picture was circulated around the world before traditional news organisations even knew about it.) And then I saw the (branded) simulator footage of what happened and thought “what great advertising for the simulator company”. I expect the airline will probably even do well out of it.
And the other night a friend insisted on showing me his application video for that £70,000 job to live on a beautiful Australian island, and after thinking “That’s a lot of money to be paid for an idyllic 6 month holiday” I then thought “That’s very smart marketing for the Australian Tourist Authority – how far would £70,000 get you in ordinary media? Certainly not millions upon millions of server-crashing hits”.
No doubt some terribly posh girl called Natasha or Anoushka will say that’s PR not advertising, but then she’d probably spend more than that on handbags and bellinis
Chalky
Comment » | Makes you think
January 15th, 2009 — 7:52pm

Clients in shock and awe at how quickly a blog post can be online
Comment » | Made us smile, Work
January 15th, 2009 — 7:47pm
Is going on right now at their office
1 comment » | Work